Ira Martin Friedman
Areas of Practice

Family Law
* Dissolution
* Custody
* Premarital and Post Marital Agreements
* Cohabitation Agreements
* Enforcement of Spousal and Child Support Orders
* Appeals
* Domestic Partnership Formation
* Domestic Partnership Dissolution
* Paternity
* Post Dissolution Modification
* Interstate Enforcement of Orders

Civil
* Litigation
* Appeals
* Collection of Civil Judgments
* Arbitration
* Enforcement of Arbitration Awards
* Mediation
* Professional Collections
* Business Litigation
* Breach of Contract
* Declaratory Relief Actions
* Partition Actions

The Law Offices of Ira M. Friedman was founded in 1975. Abby B. Friedman later joined Ira M. Friedman to form the present law firm of Friedman & Friedman. The firm handles all phases of family law, including appeals, and also handles civil litigation at the trial and appellate level in State and Federal courts.

Friedman & Friedman has been the prevailing party in three published family law cases. The Marriage of Gavron and The Marriage of Keech have become hallmark cases in the areas of spousal support and attorney's fees respectively.

Friedman & Friedman has begun to handle matters involving the dissolution of domestic partnerships, and other matters which may arise in same sex relationships. Our attorneys will apply their knowledge and experience to this evolving area of law.

The firm also has a special emphasis on enforcing child and spousal support orders and judgments in California, regardless of whether the original order or judgment was from California. The firm likewise enforces civil judgments where the debtor or any income or assets of the debtor are in California.

We are not affiliated with any collection agency or a mass mill handling thousands of cases. Each case is handled by a licensed California lawyer. The law firm of Friedman & Friedman is "AV" rated by Martindale Hubbell.

Ira M Friedman
Friedman & Friedman
9454 Wilshire Blvd #313
Beverly Hills CA 90212-2904
Tel: 310 273-2800
Fax: 310 273-3642
E-mail: imf@f-f-law.com
Comments: 0
Votes:21